Pope Frogbutt I wrote:
: "Steve Leyland" <***@meow.org.invalid> wrote
: in news:d6bl28$g69$***@valis.databasix.com:
:
:: Pope Frogbutt I wrote:
:: :":*Referee*:" <***@foundling.invalid> wrote in
::: news:140520050833115428%***@foundling.invalid:
:::
:::: In article <d64d35$pr$***@valis.databasix.com>, Steve Leyland
:::: <***@meow.org.invalid> wrote:
::::
::::: :*Referee*: wrote:
:::::: In article <d638g6$a8e$***@shpxurnq.databasix.com>, S.Shortcake
:::::: <***@ofthe.dragonlover> wrote:
::::::
::::::: I just want you to know than I'm right now downloading and
::::::: forwarding every single picture from your "Subject99" set.
:::::::
::::::: A certain lady at a certain FBI email address is getting an
::::::: eyefull of this poor little redheaded boy. She told me that the
::::::: most effective way to deal with you pedos, is to forward as
::::::: attachment, and that NO ONE is anon when they post to usenet,
::::::: that every single person can be found with very little work.
:::::::
::::::: It would seem to some that this is alotta work for me to do
::::::: this, but it's worth it. I want this lady to see this kids
::::::: penis, his ass, his balls, his tortured eyes, his bruises, and
::::::: the fact that he's not even old enough to grow pubic hair.
:::::::
::::::: You stupid, sick, fucking child raper.
:::::::
::::::: Knock knock.
:::::::
::::::: --
::::::: SS
::::::
:::::: Hey SS, think we could get the name of that agent? "She" needs to
:::::: be told she's exceeding her authority. She has no legal basis
:::::: with which to request a civilian to break the law. This also
:::::: interferes with the chain of custody, making the pictures of
:::::: little value as evidence of posting.
:::::
::::: apparently it only took one forwarded binary attachment for the
::::: FBI to rekindle their interest in your little boy rapists club.
::::: very soon you'll hear the sweet sound of your doors breaking in
::::: at dawn then you'll all be in jail where you so clearly belong.
::::::
:::::: Have you *looked* at those pictures? I haven't, but from what
:::::: I've read, this poster doesn't post what would be against the
:::::: law where he lives.
:::::
::::: the last time you sickos invaded text froups circa 2001, I
::::: downloaded *one* binary image to check it out. it contained a pic
::::: of a baby perhaps 3 years old with some sick bastard's penis in
::::: his anus. the look of pain on that poor baby's face actually made
::::: me question how on earth a human being could do something like
::::: that to such an innocent. but then I realised, you so-called BL
::::: pedos aren't human. if you can look at images like that and find
::::: them even slightly erotic instead of fucking disgusting, you
::::: really should put a pistol in your mouth and pull the trigger.
::::: if it would help, I could post other methods of suicide if you
::::: don't have access to a gun.
::::
:::: One image causes you to condemn a whole series of newsgroups? Are
:::: you serious? Would you hold everyone responsible for all the spam,
:::: too?
::
:: ah yes, the spam is the reason you avoid posting in clearly labelled
:: alt.binaries.* groups isn't it? so what about the casual innocent
:: browser of usenet who sees one of these alt.fan.* groups you lot
:: feebly attempt to hide in and curiously downloads a binary? not to
:: mention the fact that it is net abuse to post binaries in a text
:: group. go to alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.boys or something equally
:: as obvious to post your sick pedo filth. the spam argument just
:: doesn't hunt. you can post a killfile tutorial.
:
: There are all kinds of binary groups, including ones with pedo or
: pedophile in the name, that have little or no spam.
agreed. I'll even cmsg a few new ones for them if it rids them from
alt.fan.*
:
::
:::: As I recall, being on the Troll side at that time, the BLs were up
:::: in arms against the baby-rape posters. They do try to police
:::: themselves.
::
:: BLs are pedophiles, lets' face the facts and cut the bullshit? OK,
:: everyone's sexuality is different and there's no harm in that, but
:: grown men looking at images of naked young boys is just plain fucking
:: wrong.
::::
:::::: If you're going to bully people, at least do it right. You shame
:::::: your fellow Trolls by attacking the wrong poster, and the wrong
:::::: pictures,
:::::
::::: STFU, all pictures of naked children are wrong and illegal.
::::: surely you don't actually expect us to look at your sick filth to
::::: check the content?
::::
:::: I have pictures of myself that were taken when I was a baby, with
:::: not a stitch of clothes on. As a kid, I was totally embarrassed
:::: when my mother insisted on showing them to all my friends. Oh how I
:::: wished they were illegal, and that my mother, who would have killed
:::: the warden, was put behind bars for what she did to me. But alas,
:::: they weren't illegal then, and unfortunately for the potential
:::: parent caused embarrassment of all the children of today, they
:::: aren't illegal now. Child pornography is illegal in most places,
:::: but the definition of it varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
:::: The US Supreme Court has ruled that it's defined by "community
:::: standards", but they neglected to tell us what the hell that is.
:::: I've prosecuted such cases. It's not always as clear cut as you
:::: might think.
::
:: did your mother post your baby pics on usenet for creepy old pedo
:: guys like rolex to jerk off to? perhaps you'd have felt differently
:: had that been the case?
::::
:::: Freedom of expression is protected by the Constitution. This
:::: applies to photographs, if they are determined to have "artistic"
:::: value. This is illustrated by what happened in the controversial
:::: Maplethorpe Exhibition. There was a picture of a naked 9 year old
:::: boy climbing on an easy chair. It raised quite a stir. It was
:::: accused of being child pornography, but after a lot of official
:::: inquiries, it was determined that the boy was a naturist (nudist).
:::: His whole family was, and had consented to have photographs taken
:::: of the family members in their usual lack of attire. The ruling was
:::: that it wasn't pornography, and that it was legal art. For myself,
:::: I didn't think it was anything more than a glorified family
:::: snapshot. Maybe I lack the artistic sense to see it differently.
::
:: no doubt despite this dubious legal approval, rolex and his ilk were
:: wanking their shrivelled dicks off to it as soon as it got posted in
:: your ever so secret hideaway pedo text groups.
::::
:::: As it stands now, in most places in the US, pictures of naked
:::: people of any age are legal, if the subjects are engaging in
:::: "normal" public activities. This specifically applies to naturists
:::: and family pictures. Posed pictures that do not have the subjects
:::: in sexually suggestive positions, may be considered art, and not
:::: pornography, depending on which "community standards" are used to
:::: evaluate them, and they are changing from day to day. It can be
:::: very frustrating to prosecute these cases.
::::
:::: Did you know that the State of Rhode Island passed a law including
:::: digitally created images, that have never had any part of a real
:::: human in them, in the definitions of pornography? The Supreme Court
:::: had previously ruled that digitally created images were exempt from
:::: the pornography rules. Y Not posted about that last year. I don't
:::: know if the State law has been tested yet. I just now remembered
:::: it. I should look into it. Maybe.
::::
:::::: and by the way, you look stupid doing that. But, if you like
:::::: people laughing at you...
:::::
::::: nono, *you* are the one who looks fucking stupid. and I'm not
::::: laughing, trust me.
::::
:::: Trust you? I don't think so. Not until you know what you're talking
:::: about.
:::: What good is attacking these people, if you can't stick to the
:::: truth? Don't you want to be better than they are? There are more
:::: than enough reasons to attack them, without you having to be so
:::: lazy that you have to make them up.
::
:: I will continue to attack until you all start posting in a clearly
:: named group in the alt.binaries.* hierarchy. terribly sorry if this
:: inconveniences any pedos in their dowloading of images of children to
:: masturbate to.
:
: They think they're hiding in the non binary groups, yet all they do
: bring shit down on themselves.
with a mere 2 mouse clicks I can type any poster nym or email addy and find
all their posts in any groups. hiding is no longer possible for anyone.
:
::::
:::::: I am, REFEREE
:::::
::::: You are, BUBBA'S BITCH.
::::
:::: Oh boy did you get that wrong! I'm the guy who puts crime-in-alls
:::: in there for Bubba to play with. If I can prove anyone here is
:::: committing a crime in my jurisdiction, I'll prosecute the pants off
:::: them, to make it more convenient for Bubba. But I'm not going to
:::: harass the whole population into being MORE secure! That would be
:::: really stupid. Oh, isn't that what you're doing? Oops! The best way
:::: to get them is to leave them alone in the newsgroups. Let them get
:::: complacent and feel safe. They're so stupid, they'll let down their
:::: guard and post something that gives them away. When they do that,
:::: the other BLs who are too stupid to have any brains at all, will
:::: make *sure* I know about it, by fighting over who gets to tell the
:::: idiot he's exposing himself to all the LEAs who are already finding
:::: out where he lives.
::
:: LEA are clearly doing nothing about these pedos. remember the last
:: wars in 2001?
:: I was told leave it, we will deal with them.. 5 years later and still
:: going on.
:: I'd say they've had more than enough time and have failed, now its
:: time for fluffy to take over and turn the light on these cockroaches
:: of usenet.
::::
:::: I actually support their security measures. I want them to feel
:::: safe. The smart ones *will* be safe. I don't mind that, because
:::: they're also smart enough not to molest children. It's the stupid
:::: ones who do that, and they're also too stupid to follow the advice
:::: of the groups' "security experts". I don't much care about the porn
:::: on their computers, it's probably all encrypted, I'm after more
:::: important fishies. I want to get the dangerous sharks, the
:::: MOLESTERS, off of the kids, and into Bubba's not so tender mercies.
:::: While we work from different sides of the issue, Y Not wants the
:::: same thing. That's why I support what he does, and why the stupid
:::: BLs hate both of us. We could be a good tag team, except that I
:::: don't think either of us would look good in tights.
::
:: or socks even?
::::
:::: So, lets see of you understood what I said. If you want these
:::: "pedos" to be put in a "correctional facility" (politically correct
:::: name for "prison", as if that'll make them into country clubs),
:::: don't scare them into protecting themselves from being caught. Now
:::: do you get it? You've got them so scared, they're tossing you some
:::: of their own numbers, to keep you wolves at bay. You're harassment
:::: is actually making them safer and more secure, out of fear.
:::: Will knowing this now, make you stop? I DON'T THINK SO.
:::: I don't think you can control yourselves that much, even if you
:::: knew what you were doing. I know. I used to be one of you.
:::: SO, now WHO'S laughing at WHO? :-)
::
:: I think I have made my position perfectly clear already. post your
:: pedo pics in a suitably named alt.binaries.* group and I won't bother
:: anyone there. stay in alt.fan.* and we WILL trash every one of those
:: groups. that is a promise.
:: your choice. I'd sincerely prefer you to take my advice.
::::
:::: I'm REFEREE, that's WHO!
::
:: and I am meow.
::::
:::
::: Fuck off, Y-Tard.
--
Steve Leyland
mhm32x16 Smeeter#24 WSD#41
flower: three 6 four 9 five 8 eight 9
em ess en: my 1st name at purgatory dot org
Alcatroll Labs Inc (bongwater maintenance dept)
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/
http://www.radioxanadu.tk
=^MEOW MEOW ARMY^=
The action required to sustain human life is primarily intellectual:
Everything man needs has to be discovered by his mind and produced by
his effort. - Ayn Rand
======================================================================
"My suggestion is to completely ignore idiots like Leland. They are the
lowest form of pond scum. People like him have tried unsuccessfully in
the past to disrupt the newsgroup. The best medicine is to completely
ignore them. As I'm sure you'll see, they're most intelligent response
is to yell nasty names. Other than that, they have nothing."
JG, netKKKop, alt.sailing.asa
======================================================================
"Warning to all:
Steve Leyland is a trolling twat of the highest order. Killfile the
muppet now and move on. Even the briefest of searches on his past
UseNet posts will reveal the truth. You have been warned. *plonk*"
Bear, netKKKop, uk.rec.motorcycles
======================================================================
"I didn't delete any part of your meaningless, pointless, worthless
post in order to clearly demonstrate that you are the nemesis of
Usenet: the crossposting, non-editing, diagram-creating worthless,
dickless, brainless, gutless, mindless, ball-less, spineless, flaccid,
obese, fish-belly pale, ugly, VD-ridden, moronic, bald, hunch-backed,
flat-footed, odoriferous, obnoxious, fecal-smelling, buck-toothed,
physically handicapped, fungus-infected, HIV positive, mud-packing,
masturbating, whining, simpering, self-important, arrogant, egomaniacal
POS that takes up more bandwidth than a despicable binary-poster, and
for no apparent reason beyond seeing his own defecatory vomitus
slithering down the screen in vile green rivulets."
Admiral Halsey, alt.sailing.asa
======================================================================
"I went to the Garden of Love,
And saw what I never had seen;
A Chapel was built in the midst,
Where I used to play on the green.
And the gates of this Chapel were shut
And "Thou shalt not," writ over the door;
So I turned to the Garden of Love
That so many sweet flowers bore.
And I saw it was filled with graves,
And tombstones where flowers should be;
And priests in black gowns were walking their rounds,
And binding with briars my joys and desires."
William Blake.
======================================================================
"When the Earth has been ravaged and the animals are dying, a tribe of
people from all races, creeds and colours shall put their faith in
deeds, not words, and make the land green again. They shall be known as
Warriors of the Rainbow, protectors of the environment."
Native American prophecy
|\ _.-'~~""'~`'~)
/, ~-,__,,,.'~ ,-;;--''
|,4) ./ ' ; ;/'
'-~~;'@ ( ; ;
_.--'' _.-_..' .;.'
(,_..----''' (,..--''
Meow